The parallels between the immigration debate in the USA and in Europe is striking, as are the politics that define this debate. It is worth looking a bit deeper to understand why the Leftist-Globalist Elites are trying to destroy Western life through mass uncontrolled immigration (AKA the ‘Open Border Movement’).
Bear in mind that of course by ‘the Leftist-Globalist Elite’ – I mean the Controllers who know exactly what they are doing, and Useful Idiots who are blinded by the dogma (and zealotry) of Multiculturalism / Open Borders / Political Correctness. The Useful Idiots are clearly more than 90% – they will not even be aware of the theories put forth in this article, even though many emanate from Left wing academics.
The latter are trained to respond to emotional stimuli (Skinnerite / Pavlovian (behavioural psychology) control grid) – so their Controllers can direct their energies once certain events have been staged (or taken advantage of, by the mainstream media).
A prime example was the Aylan Kurdi saga – the drowned boy whose tragic death went viral and led to an orgy of virtue-signalling, short-termist thinking, and Merkel’s “come on on in, boys” invitation to the entire Muslim world. In short, it was emotional blackmail with a denial of facts and logic, forcing through a deeply political agenda. To criticise the ripping up of the Dublin Agreement to facilitate and encourage this mass human tsunami – was to be an unfeeling monster, who does not care about drowned babies.
Is it deliberate collapse for ideological reasons or is it a form of subconscious societal suicide? or something else? Just what DO the ‘Controllers’ want to achieve? Before you read on, you might want to watch the following video:
What follows is food for thought. Four theories to explain what is going on, at first sight disparate, unconnected or competing – later we will explore how they very much tie in, complement and enhance each other. They are different sides of the same object; providing a three-dimensional view of what is going on.
PARADIGM SHIFT – 4 STAGES
As you explore the theories presented below, keep an open mind. At this stage you should try not to allow any prejudices to creep in. You are sifting information, then forming a view afterwards: the scientific method. If you don’t, you are consciously deciding to react emotionally and prejudicially, which is unscientific and more to the point, gives away control from the individual (your own rational examination) to the collective (groupthink, approved thinking, etc).
The first run-through should be to read all the text but not watch the videos or follow the links. If you have not already moved into Stage 2 or 3 below – then there is little point reading this again.
If you have – read again but take the time to watch each video and explore each link as you go – your second read through will take you to Stage 4 – no question! You will have a complete paradigm shift and this will show itself by manifesting when you read or watch anything from the ‘mainstream’: you will spot things that you would otherwise miss; you will see how staged and contrived everything is.
- Stage one is to see such EU immigration decisions and policies as ‘suicidal’, ‘stupid’, ‘naive’, and ‘incompetent’.
- Stage two is to think deeper and come to the realisation that such a massive level of stupidity or incompetence does not make any sense, given the education, massive resources, think-tanks and advisers that these people have behind them.
- Stage three is for it to dawn on you that this leaves the inescapable conclusions that at least in large part, the economic and social chaos and fundamental transformation, is entirely by design.
- Stage four is to examine what the motives could be and the theories that are driving such drastic change in European society, on a scale never before seen in European history in such a short space of time.
The four theories are as follows:
1 – THE CLOWARD-PIVEN STRATEGY
Leftists are trying to implode the system by overloading the Welfare State with mass uncontrolled immigration. The purpose is to create a ‘crisis point’. The people will suffer pain, loss and fear – after which they will be crying out to their political class for help. The Left will present themselves as the ‘solution’: MORE EUROPE.
In essence ‘more Europe’ is a totalitarian regime such as an EU Superstate with centralised control and the end of democracy, with a form of welfare socialism and deliberate impoverishment for the masses (to help control them), and a technocratic oligarchy on top (billionaires, wealthy families, multinationals, a new ‘aristocracy’ of bureaucrats, politicians and Leftist activists.
This strategy is called the Cloward-Piven Strategy. First proposed in 1966 and named after Columbia University sociologists Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, the “Cloward-Piven Strategy” seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse.
In essence, it is a classic example of the use of the Machiavellian ‘Hegelian Dialectic‘ (‘crisis-reaction-solution’) which has dictated world politics for generations. First of all you start with something you wish to achieve which will not be acceptable if publicly known, in a situation of status quo. Secondly you create a crisis on purpose (usually hiding your involvement, e.g. via a ‘false flag’ event or series of deliberate policies allegedly for another agenda), for which you will present a solution that seemingly solves the problem. Then the problem is solved, you have achieved your original goals whilst selling it to the people.
- PROBLEM – WHERE WE WERE AND WHAT THEY WANTED TO ACHIEVE: How to reinvigorate a failing EU project, and indeed create the desired fully federalised / centralised EU Superstate? The EU was heading for collapse (threats of Brexit / Grexit, Eurozone economic collapse, rise of right-wing and anti-EU sentiment)? Maintaining the status quo risked the EU collapsing, or reaching a point beyond which the EU project could not be ‘saved’. At this point – a few years back – they seemed further away than ever from an EU Superstate. Just keeping it going was the problem – never mind pushing for deeper integration and centralisation, with an increasingly sceptical and disillusioned EU populace.
- SOLUTION – WHERE THEY WANTED TO GET US TO: Create a crisis which will force the people to accept various measures. What better way than mass uncontrolled immigration: (a) Muslims will be more likely to vote for Leftist parties (whoever promises the most goodies and is seen as ‘pro migrant’), (b) Muslims have much high birth rates, creating more burden on the state and changing demographics rapidly, (c) the massive welfare burden may cause numerous EU nation-state economies to collapse and require ECB bailout which will make them ‘debt-slaves’ to the EU monster, (d) massive right-wing resentment will allow censorship and attacks against free speech (sold as ‘tolerance’ and ‘hate crime’ measures), (e) terror risks and border chaos will allow massive increases in a push for EU border control / EU army / integration and centralisation of security apparatus / massive police and surveillance powers etc.
- REACTION – THIS IS HOW THEY DID IT: Therefore, this was all set up by creating the preconditions for a crisis, before presenting the solutions: the EU and Globalists elites then came up with the ‘Arab Spring’ (which turned out to be more like an ‘Islamist Winter‘). Curiously, rather than democracy and strengthened economies – this seemed to create war / economic collapse / impoverishment / chaos / massive rise in Radical Islam and organised criminality – all resulting in migrant waves from Muslim nations into Europe. Nobody mentions how curious it is that the Arab Spring occurred in nations directly adjacent to continental Europe (directly bordering by land and sea) – yet NOT in any of the other 56 Muslim-majority nations. Not at all suspicious? They have even exacerbated and prolonged the Syrian war, prompting Putin to get involved and actually tackle ISIS, which belatedly forced the US and allies to actually do something. Voila – now we have somebody to blame for the ‘refugee waves’ as well… Putin is now every day touted in the Controlled Media, as the evil architect of the refugee crisis, to bankrupt Europe. In our Orwellian world, Putin is the new ‘Emmanuel Goldstein’. But how to keep the migrants flowing, when the disgruntled EU public threaten to revolt? the answer it seems, is to set up two new migrant waves: (a) a visa-free LEGAL arrangement with Turkey, which will disguise untold numbers who can now fly by plane and the figures disguised, whilst the entire Muslim world has visa-free travel TO Turkey and can be given fake Turk paperwork there, and (b) a renewed wave from lawless North Africa, especially Libya, which somehow we have to ferry from the Libyan coast all the way to mainland Europe, when the logical thing to do is to return to the shores of Libya and scuttle the boats they come on.
Ordo Ab Chao. Order out of chaos.
To create an EU Superstate with totalitarian socialism, the goal is to implode EU states and distract the masses with social problems (fear of Muslims, terrorism, economic collapse, day-to-day survival), meanwhile selling closer EU integration and massive loss of civil liberties as the ‘only way’ to ‘pull together and unite’ to get out of the chaos. Expect a false flag attack terrorist in the UK before the referendum, which the media will use fear to sell to us staying in the EU (for security and intelligence sharing etc).
2 – THE COUDENHOVE-KALERGI PLAN
Another Leftist theory is the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan. I planned to write a longer post about this at some point because it is key to understanding the policies of EU bureaucrats and national leaders, which are seemingly nonsensical.
Count Richard Nikolaus von Coudenhove-Kalergi (herein Coudenhove-Kalergi) was born in 1894 in Japan, of a Count and Austro-Hungarian diplomat (Heinrich), and Mitsuko Aoyama (daughter of a major landowner and very wealthy family in Japan). He took Czechoslovakian residency from 1919, then French nationality from 1939 to his death in 1972. He was also a member of the Jewish Masonic, the B’Nai B’Rith.
Through his fathers extensive diplomatic contacts, his wealth, and his aristocratic ties to numerous powerful families (and their networks) – Coudenhove-Kalergi started a movement away from the spotlight of the public, but which gained massive and overwhelming support from the pawnbrokers of the time. This Pan-Europan Movement. Via his association with the Rothschild family, Coudenhove-Kalergi was introduced eventually to the Warburgs, a powerful American banking family who bankrolled the Pan-Europa to the tune of 60,000 marks (a fortune at the time).
In essence the Pan-Europa envisioned a New World Order leading to eventual One World Government, but installed in stages and over long periods of time to avoid scrutiny and the inevitable protest of the general public. The process was to be one of “Regionalisation”, where there would be 5 or 6 massive superstates, of which a European Union would be the prototype. The main purpose of the Superstates would be to centralise powers away from sovereign governments and undermine notions of democracy in the name of the ‘greater good’. To follow – American, Asian, African Unions – something the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) – a shadowy group with massive influence and no oversight or transparency (much like the Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission and others) – picked up on in their policy papers which drive US and United Nations agendas.
This is the idea that to create an EU superstate, the will of the people has to be diluted, subverted or destroyed. This is to be done slowly and incrementally. A ratchet of many small steps to disarm the public, each step – like a ratchet – cannot be reversed. Each step – proposed as a solution to some ‘other’ issue (trade, fishing, defence) – seems reasonable enough that it can overcome objections and be implemented. The movement is inexorably from A through Z. But the totality of the steps (destination Z) is never revealed, for the people would never agree to it.
Not an analogy Coudenhove-Kalergi uses, of course – but I liken it to boiling a frog in a pot of water. Thrown into boiling water – the frog reacts instinctively and for self preservation will jump out. But place him in a pot of cold water and very slowly bring to the boil, the frog will die and never jump out – at least when he realises, he will be too weakened and incapable.
More importantly – Coudenhove-Kalergi saw this as a project which would be led by European and American aristocrats and influential families, and ‘organised Jewry’ from the shadows, manipulating the political processes which lead to it.
The best way to achieve this is mass uncontrolled immigration, to homogenise the population and erode the power of national, ethnic or religious identity. The resulting masses will be busy infighting (ethnic strife and poverty) to resist creeping totalitarianism, and over time, a more mixed populace will be more malleable and therefore controllable, and a new ‘European’ identity will emerge. There is also an element of Eugenics (a theory very popular with the aristocracy and academia of the time) – people like Coudenhove-Kalergi believed that a mongrel race would be degenerate and stupid, therefore more controllable – whereas he specifically cites the interbreeding of the Jewish race as one of the reasons why they are superior.
The infighting also feeds into the Hegelian Dialectic (problem-reaction-solution) – because it distracts the public from what the Elites are doing as puppet-masters, and they can achieve various aims by presenting ‘solutions’ to the conflict dynamics they are setting up. In short – a mass of migrants sets up the opportunity to create Hegelian Dialectic trigger points to push the general population any direction the Elites want them to go.
A few examples:
- Want to bring in enhanced surveillance and police powers, martial law, redraft Constitutions, bring in integrated EU secret service and intelligence sharing, EU Army etc? fine – lets’s have another Paris massacre (or, more to the point, allow such an already planned event to take place to garner political capital from it).
- Want to silence and marginalise anti-EU and anti-immigration sentiment? plant saboteurs in their marches, to create violence, then get the media to spin it to malign dissenting political views by caricaturing them as Nazis.
- Want to clamp down on political criticism? create new Hate Crimes, threaten to take children of parents, threaten public shaming, pay Antifa protesters to cause trouble, bring in new censorship laws to control social media, etc – all sold to the public in the name of ‘combating extremism’ and ‘promoting tolerance’ and ‘humanitarianism’.
It is quite clear that vast wealth and privilege, Coudenhove-Kalergi’s own mixed race heritage and lack of national and cultural identity coloured all his views.
Like any person with a healthy ego, so wealthy he did not need to work but wanting to bring meaning to his life, he sought to rationalise all these factors (mixed national identity, race and culture) – into positives. I have read his dreary ‘Practical Idealism’, and it is pseudo-intellectual, ideological garbage – yet it has fundamentally shaped EU politics for generations. He went so far as to turn his own ‘identity issues’ into an ‘idealism’ and a virtue in and of itself: in essence, Coudenhove-Kalergi is one of the founders of Multiculturalism as a de facto religion. He was also a committed hardcore socialist, so like all Far Left, his views tended towards dogmatic beliefs that must be enforced on others ‘for their own good’, and because they are not enlightened, they do not even need to know let alone be consulted about such matters.
“Inbreeding builds character, weakens the mind – crossing weakens the character, strengthens the Spirit. Where inbreeding and crossbreeding meet under happy auspices, they testify to the highest type of human being the strongest character with the sharpest mind connects.”
Coudenhove-Kalergi, “Practical Idealism”, 1924
What kind of garbage is this? This man was behind the EU ideal, Europe Day, the EU anthem, even influencing the design process of the EU flag – yet we never here about him? He has postage stamps commemorating him in Austria, yet his book is banned in Germany, never reprinted and very hard to find? And all of this, and he has barely a mention in any European literature, even the Charlemagne Prize website? Something doesn’t add up, and that’s an understatement.
“The man of the future will be a mongrel. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-negroid race of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples and the diversity of individuals.”
Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, “Practical Idealism”, 1924
This is a formalised plan which even has an annual Kalergi Prize (officially the Charlemagne Prize) former winners, Merkel, Blair, and other pro-Open Borders traitors. A quick look at its Patrons (European nobility, Presidents of Austria and Germany) fits the narrative above. The ‘founders’ page is equally illuminating, hiding as it does the massive influence of Coudenhove-Kalergi (despite giving the first award to him as the founder of the Pan-Europa – you would think they would have MUCH more to say).
Instead, this page specifically cites Arnold Toynbee- a British historian with very specific views about ‘miscegenation’ (deliberate racial mixing) as a means to peace and unity, the destruction of the concept of race and ethnic identity.
This is far from unique in today’s academia – “We’ll keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as the white race is destroyed. Not deconstructed, but destroyed” (Noel Ignatiev, Harvard Professor, writing in Harvard Magazine). Texas Professor Jose Angel Gutierrez, said: “We have an ageing white America. They are not making babies. They are dying. The explosion is in our population … I love it. They are shitting in their pants with fear. I love it. We have got to eliminate the gringo, and what I mean by that, is if the worst comes to the worst, we have got to kill him.” Such incredible racism seems to be tolerated from ethnic minorities, but for a white person to say such a thing? well, their career would be over. Ethnic minorities? a scandal that blows over. Is this not suspicious – racism is possible for everyone, but anti-white racism is not ‘a thing’; multiculturalism must be enforced as an ideal, but only in majority-white countries. To object to either is to be a racist.
Toynbee also admired the Islamic world for (in his eyes) ‘the extinction of race consciousness’ – naive as he is, in not understanding that Islam is fully controlled by Arabs and their racism is endemic. From extreme and open anti-Semitism, to racism against blacks, the word for whom has always been “Abeed” which means ‘slave’, as black people have been the slave class for Arabs for long before Western slavery (indeed, it was the Arabs who sold white Europeans the black slaves for the most part). Black slavery continues to this day – even the Über-Liberal Wikipedia has a section on it. Yet this Leftist academic Islamophilia – romanticising the thoroughly unpalatable reality of Islam today and throughout the ages – is nothing new, and it continues today. Not even logic dissection of the Qur’an, or Muslims explicitly explaining why they commit atrocities, or mass murders in Paris (twice in a year) – seem to remove these rose-tinted glasses. If anything, the Left ‘doubles down’ in its worship (or is it fear) of Islam. That is the the thinking at the lower levels (Useful Idiots), but of course the Controllers see Islam as a wonderful totalitarian system with many aspects they admire – and the perfect ‘too’ to wield to carry out their social engineering.
UPDATE 17/05/16: Since first written I have been researching the origins of the New World Order, of which the EU project is a prototype super-region (see above). In Tragedy & Hope 101, in Chapter 3, Plummer writes:
“Unfortunately, as Ed Griffin points out in The Quigley Formula, many people struggle to believe that their highly respected “leaders” are conspiring to cheat them out of truly representative government. After all, our leaders constantly sing the praises of representative government. They tell us that the citizens are sovereign, voters control national policies, and any suggestion to the contrary is ridiculous. After a lifetime of being fed this version of reality, the idea of a global conspiracy to destroy national sovereignty (involving both government and government advisors) is, understandably, difficult to accept. But the greatest weapon against knee-jerk disbelief often comes directly from the conspirators themselves. For instance, Arnold J. Toynbee (a high-ranking member of the Network), left little doubt when he wrote:
Arnold J. Toynbee, as quoted by G. Edward Griffin in The Quigley Formula. You can view this in the following video (teed up for the Toynbee quote but worth watching in its entirety).
Toynbee – a brief look at this one man gives a lot of clues to what is going on today: (a) glorifying the virtues of Islam as noble and espousing the need to ‘propagate’ them, (b) a clear proponent of racial mixing / miscegenation in the vein of Coudenhove-Kalergi (c) worshipped by the EU Elites and the Charlemagne Prize but unknown to the public and (d) a clear proponent of destruction of national sovereignty, and of the right of a secretive Global Elite to orchestrate a vast conspiracy to bring about a New Word Order /One World Government, and to deceive and deliberately lie to the masses. So there you have it: Mass Muslim invasion, white genocide via migration / high birth rates / mixing, ‘Open Borders’, New World Order and an admission of a conspiracy to betray the public to an agenda they must not be aware of.
Together we can see strands of today’s EU policy making in the Utopian, academic musings of people like Toynbee – who thinks the answer to Mankind’s problems lies in removing race and identity, and that Islam is some kind of noble model and ‘unifying force’ for removal of race consciousness.
This is clearly ‘white genocide’ wrapped up as Multiculturalism, for deeper idealogical reasons which are not openly discussed with the public at large. It is also aided by a vast network of ‘Open Borders’, pro-immigration, refugee charities, anarchist and Far Left groups – many linked by massive funding from ex-Nazi collaborator George Soros. He also funded Arab Spring group in Libya, Egypt, Tunisia, Syria and others, even funding neo-Nazis in Ukraine to overthrow the legitimate elected leader and install a puppet pro-EU government.
“The EU should “do its best to undermine” the “homogeneity” of its member states, the UN’s special representative for migration has said. UN Special Representative for Migration, Peter Sutherland, told peers the future prosperity of many EU states depended on them becoming multicultural.” – As reported on the BBC – 21.06.12. Sutherland is a Bilderberger, ex-Goldman Sachs (like many in the NWO elite).
And then we have the Cultural Marxist agenda of the Frankfurt School academics. This is another article, but it is interesting to note their ’11 point plan of subversion’ listed:
Point 5: Huge immigration to destroy identity.
The ‘Kalergi Plan’ as it is often referred to, is now become increasingly well known and accepted among the fringe ‘alternative right’ (what the press would sweepingly label Nazi or Far Right). Indeed, former President of the Czech Republic seems to be the first current or former head of a nation state to openly accuse the EU of this plan:
“Migration is a method with which to dilute the current European countries, to create a sort of docile mass that will become the future new European. This is what dictators in the past always wanted, the Hitlers and Stalins. The collectivity of European elites is doing the same evil as that done by the individuals in the past.” Former Czech Republic President Vaclav Klaus.
Are you now beginning to see that the Coudenhove-Kalergi is a lot more real than some ‘right wing conspiracy theory’?
Can you see how all the strands interweave?
Can you see that it ALL flows from Leftist academics then filters into the political debate, then into policy? Yet very little of this information is known by the public at large, and all of it is there for the sceptical to check for themselves.
If you cannot, consider the fact that this very article would be considered hate speech and racist by MANY people, then consider the logic of that viewpoint. Where am I being hateful or racist? Yet today, to defend your own identity (if you are white) – is to be by default, a racist.
3 – r/K SELECTION THEORY
Well worth watching the following videos for an understanding of migration and population replacement. It might be the most illuminating scientific explanation for what is ACTUALLY going on, rather than what people are trying to achieve.
r/K Theory is hard to get your head around, but once you understand it – it very effectively explains why Western nations seem to be aiding and abetting their own destruction.
It also helps explain why the Muslim immigrants are so confident of their success. And by success, I mean complete Islamisation of the world under the superior and Allah-mandated Shariah Law and Islamic Governance.
They believe they are the superior race, destined to conquer the weak, feminised West. They are very open about their virulence, and their desire to both out-breed indigenous European nations, and to mate with Western women who should be with ‘real men’ like them. Think I am exaggerating? listen to what this young German Muslim says, or this Egyptian Imam.
If the response to mass rapes in Cologne is for 400 ‘men’ to don dresses in ‘solidarity’ with their abused women, then there can be little doubt something very, very odd is happening. This sort of nonsense, and German state-funded websites helping refugees find the G-spot – all of this feminised, Liberal nonsense is essentially tantamount to cultural suicide. At the very least it is a red rag (panties) waved in the face of the (horny) Islamic bull.
As a sociological experiment, go to your local town centre as I did recently, sit outside in Starbucks and do some people watching. Observe groups of Western men (of all races; this is not about race). Then observe groups of Muslims, not just immigrants but the new more radical second generation British Muslims. You can feel the feminine energy, the dumbed down feckless and complacent nature of Western males (particularly under 40s). You can feel the macho, wolf-like and prideful energy of many young Muslim males. I would be very surprised if you do not come away feeling quit perturbed for what this means for Europe’s future.
4 – HIJRAH – CONQUEST VIA EMIGRATION
The final theory is from the perspective of the Muslim immigrants. In the videos in the last section (German Muslim and Imam), you get a sense that there is a cultural or religious imperative behind the mass migration into Continental Europe. To understand this, you have to understand the Muslim mindset.
Islam has always been about conquest and spreading the faith by the sword. Attempting to conquer Europe is nothing new. In fact, the Crusades were a direct result of several hundred years of brutal Islamic conquest, from which 2/3 of all the lands known as Christendom were destroyed. According to Dr Bill Warner (video below) – what remains today is but a ‘bloody stump’ of what existed in now Muslim lands. Turkey, for example – was completely Greek and Christian, called Anatolia. Remember the blonde Helen of Troy? the many Greek myths and legends which seemed to have an inordinate number of blonde / red-haired / blue-eyed Greeks? Not so much nowadays – the result of the ‘miscegenation’ of forced multiculturalism via several brutal waves of Jihad conquest.
So once you understand The Crusades – and remove the Westernised, romanticised version of History forced on us by Leftist academia and Hollywood – your view of Islam and it motives should be very different. So lets now look at where it comes from.
Hijrah, or jihad by emigration, is, according to Islamic tradition, the migration or journey of Muhammad and his followers from Mecca to Yathrib, later renamed by him to Medina, in the year 622 CE.
It was after the hijrah that Muhammad for the first time became not just a preacher of religious ideas, but a political and military leader. That was what occasioned his new “revelations” exhorting his followers to commit violence against unbelievers.
Significantly, the Islamic calendar counts the hijrah, not Muhammad’s birth or the occasion of his first “revelation,” as the beginning of Islam, implying that Islam is not fully itself without a political and military component.
To emigrate in the cause of Allah – that is, to move to a new land in order to bring Islam there, is considered in Islam to be a highly meritorious act.
“And whoever emigrates for the cause of Allah will find on the earth many locations and abundance. And whoever leaves his home as an emigrant to Allah and His Messenger and then death overtakes him, his reward has already become incumbent upon Allah. And Allah is ever Forgiving and Merciful.”
The exalted status of such emigrants led a British jihad group that won notoriety (and a shutdown by the government) a few years ago for celebrating 9/11 to call itself Al-Muhajiroun: The Emigrants.
And now a hijrah of a much greater magnitude is upon us. Evidence that this is a hijrah, not simply a humanitarian crisis, came last February, but was little noted at the time and almost immediately forgotten. The Islamic State published a document entitled, “Libya: The Strategic Gateway for the Islamic State.”
Gateway into Europe, that is: the document exhorted Muslims to go to Libya and cross from there as refugees into Europe. This document tells would-be jihadis that weapons from Gaddafi’s arsenal are plentiful and easy to obtain in Libya – and that the country “has a long coast and looks upon the southern Crusader states, which can be reached with ease by even a rudimentary boat.” Gaddafi is long gone now (thanks, Hillary Clinton) – and there is nothing to stop the next migrant waves heading from Libyan shores. Once the ‘Balkan route’ is closed – two new waves begin: across the Med, and via Turkey (with the traitorous visa-free travel arrangement being agreed between Erdogan and the EU).
PIECING THE JIGSAW TOGETHER
There is a lot of information to digest, and hopefully the hyperlinks within the text help you put it all together for you if you choose to have a second read-through.
As stated in the introduction, these are not contradictory or competing theories. In fact, they are very complementary and help fill in the gaps that one single theory will not answer by itself. As stated, turning a confusing two-dimensional problem, into a three-dimensional explanation. Each theory helps explain another facet.
The Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan in my view is a long-term aim of the EU and the Leftist-Globalist elites. They wanted this to happen on a much slower basis than it has transpired in practice. They wanted to boil the water from cold, if you will. This can be viewed as the long-term ideological plan.
However the EU project was failing (as explained above), and maintaining a status quo – heading in the same direction – was to risk complete collapse of the EU project. This cannot be allowed to happen – it is the prototype of the New World Order, hence the many no-EU figures who have waded in politically or financially, hence the worldwide emotional hysteria, almost unanimous in supporting millions of migrants flooding Europe – despite the logical fallacy that it creates a bigger problem by encouraging more to come after.
So the EU elites needed to radically change the situation. They needed to create a crisis so big, that resolving it would take massive political and financial will. Which they control both. The answer to the problem, will ALWAYS be MORE EUROPE. This is the Cloward-Piven Strategy. They are using mass Muslim immigration as a socio-economic battering ram to crash Europe DELIBERATELY. From the chaos (Ordo Ab Chao) – they will create numerous ‘solutions’ which will solidify their power, usher in socialism and state totalitarianism, and force much quicker EU integration. This is the short-term crisis resolution plan.
The dynamics of Cultural Marxism, eroding the concept of manhood, the family, national and Judao-Christian values – all help explain the very curious inability for Europeans to resist this invasion. We have become dumbed-down, stupified and made weak by popular culture and generations of n knowledge of suffering and real evil that is going on in the world. We have become feminised and unable to comprehend our role as defenders of our nations, cultural identities, even our own families. Meanwhile we are faced with the most supremacist, misogynistic, macho culture in the world – Islam. It senses our weakness and senses that we are ripe for the picking. Unfortunately they are not wrong.
Finally we have the Hijrah (jihad by emigration) concept. This is a 1400 year doctrine which has turned 150 followers into 1.6 billion, today the worlds faster growing religion, with 56 Muslim majority nations who dominate the United Nations by voting as one bloc (the OIC). The media frames Radical Islam in terms of names like al-Qaeda, al-Nusra, Boko Haram, ISIS, Taliban… but in truth these are all masks of convenience. As Erdogan states, there is no ‘moderate Islam’, this is a social construct of Western Leftists to disarm their own people, in fact it is offensive to Muslims themselves.