This article has been extracted from a much longer piece called “The refugee crisis and the theories that drive it” (the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan being number 2 of 4 related theories discussed). When it comes to describing the agenda behind the seemingly-insane ‘refugee crisis’ – the ‘Kalergi Plan’) must be the most important theory to consider.
If you were wanting to share information on the Kalergi Plan – here is the information in one (more easily digestible) article, without getting bogged down with the other theory.
Another Leftist theory is the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan. I planned to write a longer post about this at some point because it is key to understanding the policies of EU bureaucrats and national leaders, which are seemingly nonsensical.
Count Richard Nikolaus von Coudenhove-Kalergi (herein Coudenhove-Kalergi) was born in 1894 in Japan, of a Count and Austro-Hungarian diplomat (Heinrich), and Mitsuko Aoyama (daughter of a major landowner and very wealthy family in Japan). He took Czechoslovakian residency from 1919, then French nationality from 1939 to his death in 1972. He was also a member of the Jewish Masonic, the B’Nai B’Rith.
Through his fathers extensive diplomatic contacts, his wealth, and his aristocratic ties to numerous powerful families (and their networks) – Coudenhove-Kalergi started a movement away from the spotlight of the public, but which gained massive and overwhelming support from the pawnbrokers of the time. This Pan-Europan Movement. Via his association with the Rothschild family, Coudenhove-Kalergi was introduced eventually to the Warburgs, a powerful American banking family who bankrolled the Pan-Europa to the tune of 60,000 marks (a fortune at the time).
In essence the Pan-Europa envisioned a New World Order leading to eventual One World Government, but installed in stages and over long periods of time to avoid scrutiny and the inevitable protest of the general public. The process was to be one of “Regionalisation”, where there would be 5 or 6 massive superstates, of which a European Union would be the prototype. The main purpose of the Superstates would be to centralise powers away from sovereign governments and undermine notions of democracy in the name of the ‘greater good’. To follow – American, Asian, African Unions – something the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) – a shadowy group with massive influence and no oversight or transparency (much like the Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission and others) – picked up on in their policy papers which drive US and United Nations agendas.
This is the idea that to create an EU superstate, the will of the people has to be diluted, subverted or destroyed. This is to be done slowly and incrementally. A ratchet of many small steps to disarm the public, each step – like a ratchet – cannot be reversed. Each step – proposed as a solution to some ‘other’ issue (trade, fishing, defence) – seems reasonable enough that it can overcome objections and be implemented. The movement is inexorably from A through Z. But the totality of the steps (destination Z) is never revealed, for the people would never agree to it.
Not an analogy Coudenhove-Kalergi uses, of course – but I liken it to boiling a frog in a pot of water. Thrown into boiling water – the frog reacts instinctively and for self preservation will jump out. But place him in a pot of cold water and very slowly bring to the boil, the frog will die and never jump out – at least when he realises, he will be too weakened and incapable.
More importantly – Coudenhove-Kalergi saw this as a project which would be led by European and American aristocrats and influential families, and ‘organised Jewry’ from the shadows, manipulating the political processes which lead to it.
The best way to achieve this is mass uncontrolled immigration, to homogenise the population and erode the power of national, ethnic or religious identity. The resulting masses will be busy infighting (ethnic strife and poverty) to resist creeping totalitarianism, and over time, a more mixed populace will be more malleable and therefore controllable, and a new ‘European’ identity will emerge. There is also an element of Eugenics (a theory very popular with the aristocracy and academia of the time) – people like Coudenhove-Kalergi believed that a mongrel race would be degenerate and stupid, therefore more controllable – whereas he specifically cites the interbreeding of the Jewish race as one of the reasons why they are superior.
The infighting also feeds into the Hegelian Dialectic (problem-reaction-solution) – because it distracts the public from what the Elites are doing as puppet-masters, and they can achieve various aims by presenting ‘solutions’ to the conflict dynamics they are setting up. In short – a mass of migrants sets up the opportunity to create Hegelian Dialectic trigger points to push the general population any direction the Elites want them to go.
A few examples:
- Want to bring in enhanced surveillance and police powers, martial law, redraft Constitutions, bring in integrated EU secret service and intelligence sharing, EU Army etc? fine – lets’s have another Paris massacre (or, more to the point, allow such an already planned event to take place to garner political capital from it).
- Want to silence and marginalise anti-EU and anti-immigration sentiment? plant saboteurs in their marches, to create violence, then get the media to spin it to malign dissenting political views by caricaturing them as Nazis.
- Want to clamp down on political criticism? create new Hate Crimes, threaten to take children of parents, threaten public shaming, pay Antifa protesters to cause trouble, bring in new censorship laws to control social media, etc – all sold to the public in the name of ‘combating extremism’ and ‘promoting tolerance’ and ‘humanitarianism’.
It is quite clear that vast wealth and privilege, Coudenhove-Kalergi’s own mixed race heritage and lack of national and cultural identity coloured all his views.
Like any person with a healthy ego, so wealthy he did not need to work but wanting to bring meaning to his life, he sought to rationalise all these factors (mixed national identity, race and culture) – into positives. I have read his dreary ‘Practical Idealism’, and it is pseudo-intellectual, ideological garbage – yet it has fundamentally shaped EU politics for generations. He went so far as to turn his own ‘identity issues’ into an ‘idealism’ and a virtue in and of itself: in essence, Coudenhove-Kalergi is one of the founders of Multiculturalism as a de facto religion. He was also a committed hardcore socialist, so like all Far Left, his views tended towards dogmatic beliefs that must be enforced on others ‘for their own good’, and because they are not enlightened, they do not even need to know let alone be consulted about such matters.
“Inbreeding builds character, weakens the mind – crossing weakens the character, strengthens the Spirit. Where inbreeding and crossbreeding meet under happy auspices, they testify to the highest type of human being the strongest character with the sharpest mind connects.”
Coudenhove-Kalergi, “Practical Idealism”, 1924
What kind of garbage is this? This man was behind the EU ideal, Europe Day, the EU anthem, even influencing the design process of the EU flag – yet we never here about him? He has postage stamps commemorating him in Austria, yet his book is banned in Germany, never reprinted and very hard to find? And all of this, and he has barely a mention in any European literature, even the Charlemagne Prize website? Something doesn’t add up, and that’s an understatement.
“The man of the future will be a mongrel. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-negroid race of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples and the diversity of individuals.”
Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, “Practical Idealism”, 1924
This is a formalised plan which even has an annual Kalergi Prize (officially the Charlemagne Prize) former winners, Merkel, Blair, and other pro-Open Borders traitors. A quick look at its Patrons (European nobility, Presidents of Austria and Germany) fits the narrative above. The ‘founders’ page is equally illuminating, hiding as it does the massive influence of Coudenhove-Kalergi (despite giving the first award to him as the founder of the Pan-Europa – you would think they would have MUCH more to say).
Instead, this page specifically cites Arnold Toynbee- a British historian with very specific views about ‘miscegenation’ (deliberate racial mixing) as a means to peace and unity, the destruction of the concept of race and ethnic identity.
This is far from unique in today’s academia – “We’ll keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as the white race is destroyed. Not deconstructed, but destroyed” (Noel Ignatiev, Harvard Professor, writing in Harvard Magazine). Texas Professor Jose Angel Gutierrez, said: “We have an ageing white America. They are not making babies. They are dying. The explosion is in our population … I love it. They are shitting in their pants with fear. I love it. We have got to eliminate the gringo, and what I mean by that, is if the worst comes to the worst, we have got to kill him.” Such incredible racism seems to be tolerated from ethnic minorities, but for a white person to say such a thing? well, their career would be over. Ethnic minorities? a scandal that blows over. Is this not suspicious – racism is possible for everyone, but anti-white racism is not ‘a thing’; multiculturalism must be enforced as an ideal, but only in majority-white countries. To object to either is to be a racist.
Toynbee also admired the Islamic world for (in his eyes) ‘the extinction of race consciousness’ – naive as he is, in not understanding that Islam is fully controlled by Arabs and their racism is endemic. From extreme and open anti-Semitism, to racism against blacks, the word for whom has always been “Abeed” which means ‘slave’, as black people have been the slave class for Arabs for long before Western slavery (indeed, it was the Arabs who sold white Europeans the black slaves for the most part). Black slavery continues to this day – even the Über-Liberal Wikipedia has a section on it. Yet this Leftist academic Islamophilia – romanticising the thoroughly unpalatable reality of Islam today and throughout the ages – is nothing new, and it continues today. Not even logic dissection of the Qur’an, or Muslims explicitly explaining why they commit atrocities, or mass murders in Paris (twice in a year) – seem to remove these rose-tinted glasses. If anything, the Left ‘doubles down’ in its worship (or is it fear) of Islam. That is the the thinking at the lower levels (Useful Idiots), but of course the Controllers see Islam as a wonderful totalitarian system with many aspects they admire – and the perfect ‘too’ to wield to carry out their social engineering.
UPDATE 17/05/16: Since first written I have been researching the origins of the New World Order, of which the EU project is a prototype super-region (see above). In Tragedy & Hope 101, in Chapter 3, Plummer writes:
“Unfortunately, as Ed Griffin points out in The Quigley Formula, many people struggle to believe that their highly respected “leaders” are conspiring to cheat them out of truly representative government. After all, our leaders constantly sing the praises of representative government. They tell us that the citizens are sovereign, voters control national policies, and any suggestion to the contrary is ridiculous. After a lifetime of being fed this version of reality, the idea of a global conspiracy to destroy national sovereignty (involving both government and government advisors) is, understandably, difficult to accept. But the greatest weapon against knee-jerk disbelief often comes directly from the conspirators themselves. For instance, Arnold J. Toynbee (a high-ranking member of the Network), left little doubt when he wrote:
Arnold J. Toynbee, as quoted by G. Edward Griffin in The Quigley Formula. You can view this in the following video (teed up for the Toynbee quote but worth watching in its entirety).
Toynbee – a brief look at this one man gives a lot of clues to what is going on today: (a) glorifying the virtues of Islam as noble and espousing the need to ‘propagate’ them, (b) a clear proponent of racial mixing / miscegenation in the vein of Coudenhove-Kalergi (c) worshipped by the EU Elites and the Charlemagne Prize but unknown to the public and (d) a clear proponent of destruction of national sovereignty, and of the right of a secretive Global Elite to orchestrate a vast conspiracy to bring about a New Word Order /One World Government, and to deceive and deliberately lie to the masses. So there you have it: Mass Muslim invasion, white genocide via migration / high birth rates / mixing, ‘Open Borders’, New World Order and an admission of a conspiracy to betray the public to an agenda they must not be aware of.
Together we can see strands of today’s EU policy making in the Utopian, academic musings of people like Toynbee – who thinks the answer to Mankind’s problems lies in removing race and identity, and that Islam is some kind of noble model and ‘unifying force’ for removal of race consciousness.
This is clearly ‘white genocide’ wrapped up as Multiculturalism, for deeper idealogical reasons which are not openly discussed with the public at large. It is also aided by a vast network of ‘Open Borders’, pro-immigration, refugee charities, anarchist and Far Left groups – many linked by massive funding from ex-Nazi collaborator George Soros. He also funded Arab Spring group in Libya, Egypt, Tunisia, Syria and others, even funding neo-Nazis in Ukraine to overthrow the legitimate elected leader and install a puppet pro-EU government.
“The EU should “do its best to undermine” the “homogeneity” of its member states, the UN’s special representative for migration has said. UN Special Representative for Migration, Peter Sutherland, told peers the future prosperity of many EU states depended on them becoming multicultural.” – As reported on the BBC – 21.06.12. Sutherland is a Bilderberger, ex-Goldman Sachs (like many in the NWO elite).
And then we have the Cultural Marxist agenda of the Frankfurt School academics. This is another article, but it is interesting to note their ’11 point plan of subversion’ listed:
Point 5: Huge immigration to destroy identity.
The ‘Kalergi Plan’ as it is often referred to, is now become increasingly well known and accepted among the fringe ‘alternative right’ (what the press would sweepingly label Nazi or Far Right). Indeed, former President of the Czech Republic seems to be the first current or former head of a nation state to openly accuse the EU of this plan:
“Migration is a method with which to dilute the current European countries, to create a sort of docile mass that will become the future new European. This is what dictators in the past always wanted, the Hitlers and Stalins. The collectivity of European elites is doing the same evil as that done by the individuals in the past.” Former Czech Republic President Vaclav Klaus.
Are you now beginning to see that the Coudenhove-Kalergi is a lot more real than some ‘right wing conspiracy theory’?
Can you see how all the strands interweave?
Can you see that it ALL flows from Leftist academics then filters into the political debate, then into policy? Yet very little of this information is known by the public at large, and all of it is there for the sceptical to check for themselves.
If you cannot, consider the fact that this very article would be considered hate speech and racist by MANY people, then consider the logic of that viewpoint. Where am I being hateful or racist? Yet today, to defend your own identity (if you are white) – is to be by default, a racist.